Posted on

Follow a High Court Judicial Review and review the evidence from Dorset Police proving systemic corruption within Hampshire Constabulary in reference to the handling of a bodged child sexual abuse case. Evidence the Hampshire Crime Commissioner Donna Jones is doing her very best to try to suppress while the Chief Officer Scott Chilton looks on.

Donna Jones

Click the link below to view a selection of just some of the authoritative evidence proving Hampshire Police produced a false police report into it’s disastrous handling of a child sexual abuse case. This evidence demonstrates a systemic ingrained culture of dishonesty within Hampshire Police at the expense of children’s right to be protected from sexual abuse. And it involves those in senior posts right up the command chain:

https://www.valuenetuk.com/dropbox/public_doc_suppressed_evidence_from_dorset_police.pdf

The evidence referenced in the linked document above is from an authoritative third party – Dorset Police. It now convincingly proves Hampshire Constabularies Professional Standards Department (PSD) produced a false police report into the handling of the Arnewood School teacher child sexual abuse case of some years ago. This latest round of evidenced Hampshire Police corruption is not about the previously established and confirmed legal failings resulting from Hampshire Police keeping the case out of the police system for 2 years, which resulted in 17 sexual offences being committed against children they could easily have prevented. Rather it is about the resulting “conduct assessment” they were directed to undertake (they failed to do that too). Dorset Police Officer’s evidence now shows the resulting police report concocted by Hampshire Constabularies PSD to contain substantive misinformation (lies). This evidence has been unlawfully suppressed by Hampshire Constabulary. The main players behind this corruption and evidence suppression at children’s expense are to name just a few: Mr. Roger Trencher the Force Solicitor, Chief Inspector David Winter who personally instructed a solicitor to lie about complaints about the false police report having already been investigated, the PSD business manager Ms. Stokel Walker and numerous others who toe the line and do as they are told. Hampshire Constabulary is now engaged in every devious unlawful practice known to man/woman to cover up the fact Hampshire Police produced a false report into its handling of a child sexual abuse case. All while the Chief Officer Scott Chilton and Hampshire Crime Commissioner Donna Jones do their very best to look the other way. This evidence is published in the public interest and will be of particular interest to any member of the public who has ever crossed swords with Hampshire Police about its negligent handling of a child sexual abuse case. It is important they know the people who defend Hampshire Police in relation to its handling of child sexual abuse cases are not above lying in police reports about child sexual abuse cases, and then paying solicitors out of public funds to lie to further cover it up and protect their self interests . This evidence is published in children’s best interests and hence in the overwhelming public interest given its ramifications for children’s safeguarding and children’s rights.

The Judicial Review

Follow the Judicial Review in the High Court of this children’s rights atrocity to see just where self serving “cronyism” by those in positions of trust and authority to protect their bogus reputations ends and children’s safeguarding rights get a look in:

https://www.valuenetuk.com/dropbox/public_doc_AC_2024_CDF_000059_high_court_filing.pdf

And here’s the full evidence bundle:

https://www.valuenetuk.com/dropbox/public_doc_AC-2024-CDF-000059_evidence_bundle.pdf

The guidance you need to know about

If ever you make a complaint to Hampshire Police get familiar with how they are supposed to deal with complaints from members of the public under law. Then hold them to it. They will bank on you not knowing your legal rights under the statutory guidance which they are supposed to adhere to. The more serious the complaint the more likely the print fades on its pages. Here’s the easy to read guidance they do not seem to understand and has gone deliberately straight out of the window in this case. And even though that means endangering children by condoning these corrupt policing practices by looking the other way.

https://www.valuenetuk.com/dropbox/LR_01_statutory_IOPC_guidance.pdf

Posted on

New Milton Advertiser and Lymington Times. The “Incuhive” and “Hive Studios” betrayal … Update

New Milton Advertiser and Lymington Times. How the Directors abused their positions of trust and cheated their vulnerable Father out of his life savings to feather their own nests.

Update.

Mr. Edward Curry has now admitted to depleting his Father’s life savings to finance his Incuhive and Hive Studious ambitions by using his lasting power of attorney to sell him more shares in his own company. The posted evidence shows he accomplished this by lying to his Father and abusing his position of trust to divert 1.2 million pounds into the project by way of unlawful share allocations.

The Incuhive and Hive Studios betrayal. Ill gotten gains, the proof.

The substantiating evidence included in this post conclusively shows how their conspiracy to try to feather their own nests at the expense of their Dad and the public purse worked.

For the official evidence proving the share allocations referenced in this post (1.2 million pounds worth) which Edward Curry has now admitted to making are proved beyond all doubt review the official Companies House records at:

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08181967/filing-history

For the proof in the form of a letter from Edward Curry himself which came AFTER the OPG involvement and proves beyond all doubt Charles was deceived about these share allocations he was paying for and how his money was being spent, see:

http://www.valuenetuk.com/dropbox/Charles_threat_to_sue.jpg

As can be seen in the letter Charles was being blatantly lied too about receiving money for the sale of shares in his company given the Companies House records prove this to be entirely false. He was actually the one being sold them by the directors using their power of attorney. His savings were being drained to pay for the shares, not visa-versa! Also note the date of this letter was 17 December 2015. It was produced by Eddie Curry AFTER the OPG outcome, his letter even confirms it at paragraph one. The OPG outcome compelled this brother and sister duo to install a panic button for Charles given they were leaving him home alone. In the reported instance it resulted in him being hospitalised.

So it is very clear given the date of this letter (the prove of deceit) the dishonest share allocations it confirms cannot have been investigated by the Office of the Public Guardian as they falsely repeatedly claim to try to cover up their despicable conduct. Including by way of desperately trying to get Facebook content removed which exposes their 1.2 million pound share scam at their Fathers expense.This evidence of deception came after the OPG involvement which had finished months earlier. The date and content of Eddie Curry’ s own letter proves it irrefutably. The letter is the proof.

The necessary ingredients of the scheme:

1) A vulnerable aging Dad with a lots of personal savings and a healthy income.
2) A lasting power of attorney to give you control over his money and interests before his death.
3) Control over your Dad’s business as directors of that company.
4) Be the main benefactors of his estate.
5) Have no moral or ethical qualms about abusing your Father’s sacred trust for your own monetary gain.

How the plan worked:

1) Step one. First they lied to their vulnerable Father and abused their positions of trust to misappropriate his life long savings which would otherwise have been subject to inheritance tax at the full rate of 40% when Charles died.

This was accomplished by this son and daughter team abusing their power of attorney and positions of trust as directors at the A@T to sell their Dad additional shares in his own company and then lying to him about it. This is proven by “Eddie” Curry’s own letters to his Dad. It is further fully corroborated by the Companies House records. They illegally siphoned off £250,250.00 of his savings on 24/4/2018, £350,000.00 on 24/4/2017 and £600,000.00 on 1/7/2015 in this way. Totalling over £1,200,000. This deception was designed to unlawfully move Charles personal life long savings into the business they controlled and were to inherit to remove their obligation to pay any inheritance tax on their Father’s personal savings when Charles’ passed away.

2) Step two. After the misappropriation of his savings the next stage of the scheme included making sure Charles received no income by way of dividends from his business during his final years on earth. As also confirmed by official Companies House records for the last 3 years his paper was run at a deliberate loss of some £600,000 by Charles’ son and daughter the benefactors of his will. This was accomplished by them using Charles’ newspaper business as a front to expense out the personal money they had cheated him out of. Therefore avoiding having to pay income tax on any new earnings due to Charles to further feather their own nests when they inherited.

3) Step three. Keep spending and illegally diverting the money your Father spent a lifetime making on setting up unrelated businesses you hope to profit from after his death under the guise of his business to avoid your tax obligations. First it was “Incuhive” and then “Hive Studios”. Both of these businesses were set up with the money these two intrepid pioneers cheated there Father out of in the last years of his life. Neither had anything to do with Charles’ newspaper business and are entirely different standalone business ventures which Charles had no rights to or legal interest in. In fact they are owned by an individual name Steve Northam who is listed as the owner of at least two dozen business at Companies House, none of which have ever been viable according to records. During this period of selfish and greedy ambition by these enterprising self serving siblings 21 jobs were sacrificed at the Advertiser and Times. Also undeniably confirmed by Companies House records.

Anyone who knew Charles will tell you he would have never sacrificed his newspaper’s people to fund new business ventures relating to “business mentoring” and “photography”. The idea is preposterous, he was a full blooded news man and always had been.

One of the rules of a lasting power of attorney is you do not do anything that the “donor” in this case Charles would not have done before the LPA was in place.

4) Step four. The cover up stage. This involves never answering the evidence but continuing to lie to deny what they have done including to readers of the paper to try to cover up the financial and psychological abuse they subjected their own elderly vulnerable Father too in the last years of his life.

Charles died on 2nd February 2019 stripped of his savings and income in a cramped modest care home room not at all suitable for his needs. He should have been in the Ritz with 24 hr care. He had the means to afford it, or used to have.

Maybe these two should answer the evidence, instead of telling the community they have been “exonerated” by the Office of the Public Guardian. They never have, as you have now seen that’s another lie. Nor has any court ever ruled on it, that’s a lie too.

For your consideration.

NMW

Below Mr. Edward Curry and Ms. Caroline Woodford
Misappropriated £1.200.000 of their vulnerable Dad’ savings.